The Saga of the False Fossil Foram Eozoon
| Type | : | ACL |
|---|---|---|
| Nature | : | Production scientifique |
| Au bénéfice du Laboratoire | : | Oui |
| Statut de publication | : | Publié |
| Année de publication | : | 2022 |
| Auteurs (1) | : | DOLAN John,r |
| Revue scientifique | : | European Journal of Protistology |
| Volume | : | |
| Fascicule | : | |
| Pages | : | |
| DOI | : | 10.1016/j.ejop.2022.125955 |
| URL | : | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S093247392200092X |
| Abstract | : | Eozoon canadense, 'the dawn animal of Canada', a large foraminifera, was announced in 1864 as the oldest fossil organism known. Camps soon formed into disbelievers of its fossil nature, agnostics, and “Eozoonists”. Eozoon would number among its proponents major figures of the time. The saga of Eozoon, or more precisely the dispute as to its actual nature, spawned hundreds of publications. Here the story is told with a new focus, one on the stature and roles of the major personalities involved, and the evidence they presented. Eozoon is considered to have been 'de-bunked' in the late 19th century. However, it will be shown that it was never indisputably proven to be inorganic. Rather Eozoon simply faded away after its most ardent defenders died. As late as 1947, it was shown as the primordial organism in a biology textbook. The saga of Eozoon remains as a valuable cautionary tale. It is an example of an artifact accepted as fact because it filled a troubling void in knowledge, i.e., at that time, the first traces of life before Cambrian, and it endured because it was promoted by only a few, but powerful, figures in the scientific establishment of the era. |
| Mots-clés | : | foraminifera; History of protistology; Karl Mobius; Precambrian life; William Carpenter; William Dawson; William King; William Logan |
| Commentaire | : | - |
| Tags | : | - |
| Fichier attaché | : | - |
| Citation | : |
Dolan JR (2022) The Saga of the False Fossil Foram Eozoon. Eur J Protistol | doi: 10.1016/j.ejop.2022.125955
|