Global Carbon Budget 2023
| Type | : | ACL |
|---|---|---|
| Nature | : | Production scientifique |
| Au bénéfice du Laboratoire | : | Non |
| Statut de publication | : | Publié |
| Année de publication | : | 2023 |
| Auteurs (123) | : | FRIEDLINGSTEIN Pierre O'SULLIVAN Michael JONES Matthew w. ANDREW Robbie, m. BAKKER Dorothee HAUCK Judith LANDSCHÜTZER Peter LE QUÉRÉ C LUIJKX Ingrid t. PETERS Glen, p. PETERS Wouter PONGRATZ Julia SCHWINGSHACKL Clemens SITCH Stephen CANADELL Josep, g. CIAIS Philippe JACKSON Robert, b. ALIN Simone ANTHONI Peter BARBERO Leticia BATES N,r BECKER Meike BELLOUIN N DECHARME Bertrand BOPP Laurent BRASIKA Ida bagus mandhara CADULE Patricia CHAMBERLAIN Matthew, a. CHANDRA Naveen CHAU Trang CHEVALLIER Frederic CHINI Louise p. CRONIN M,f DOU Xinyu ENYO Kazutaka EVANS W FALK Stefanie FEELY R,a FENG Liang FORD Daniel, j. GASSER Thomas GHATTAS Josefine GKRITZALIS Thanos GRASSI Giacomo GREGOR Luke GRUBER N GÜRSES ö HARRIS Ian HEFNER Matthew HEINKE Jens HOUGHTON Richard a. HURTT George c. IIDA Yosuke ILYINA Tatiana JACOBSON Andrew, r. JAIN Atul,k JARNÍKOVÁ Tereza JERSILD Annika JIANG Fei JIN Z,h JOOS F KATO Etsushi KEELING R,f KENNEDY Daniel KLEIN GOLDEWIJK Kees KNAUER Jürgen KORSBAKKEN Jan ivar KÖRTZINGER Arne LAN Xin LEFÈVRE N LI H,b LIU J LIU Zenghong MACCATROZZO L MARLAND Gregg MAYOT Nicolas MCGUIRE Patrick,c MCKINLEY G,a MEYERS G MORGAN Eric, j. MUNRO David, r. NAKAOKA Shin-ichiro NIWA Yosuke O'BRIEN Kevin OLSEN Are OMAR Abdirahman, m. ONO Tsuneo PAULSEN M,l PIERROT Denis POCOCK K POULTER Benjamin POWIS Carter m. REHDER Gregor RESPLANDY Laure ROBERTSON Eddy RÖDENBECK Christian ROSAN Thais, m. SCHWINGER Jorg SEFERIAN Roland SMALLMAN T. luke SMITH S SOSPEDRA-ALFONSO Reinel SUN Qingyang SUTTON Adrienne SWEENEY Colm TAKAO Shintaro TANS Pieter, p. TIAN Hanqin TILBROOK Bronte TSUJINO Hiroyuki TUBIELLO Francesco VAN DER WERF Guido, r. VAN OOIJEN Eikbert WANNINKHOF Rik WATANABE Michio WIMART-ROUSSEAU Cathy YANG Dongxu YANG Xiaojuan YUAN Wenping YUE X-l ZAEHLE Sönke ZENG Jiye ZHENG Bo |
| Revue scientifique | : | Earth System Science Data |
| Volume | : | 15 |
| Fascicule | : | 12 |
| Pages | : | |
| DOI | : | 10.5194/essd-15-5301-2023 |
| URL | : | https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/15/5301/2023/ |
| Abstract | : | Accurate assessment of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and their redistribution among the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere in a changing climate is critical to better understand the global carbon cycle, support the development of climate policies, and project future climate change. Here we describe and synthesize data sets and methodology to quantify the five major components of the global carbon budget and their uncertainties. Fossil CO2 emissions (EFOS) are based on energy statistics and cement production data, while emissions from land-use change (ELUC), mainly deforestation, are based on land-use and land-use change data and bookkeeping models. Atmospheric CO2 concentration is measured directly, and its growth rate (GATM) is computed from the annual changes in concentration. The ocean CO2 sink (SOCEAN) is estimated with global ocean biogeochemistry models and observation-based fCO2 products. The terrestrial CO2 sink (SLAND) is estimated with dynamic global vegetation models. Additional lines of evidence on land and ocean sinks are provided by atmospheric inversions, atmospheric oxygen measurements, and Earth system models. The resulting carbon budget imbalance (BIM), the difference between the estimated total emissions and the estimated changes in the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere, is a measure of imperfect data and incomplete understanding of the contemporary carbon cycle. All uncertainties are reported as ±1σ. For the year 2022, EFOS increased by 0.9 \% relative to 2021, with fossil emissions at 9.9±0.5 Gt C yr−1 (10.2±0.5 Gt C yr−1 when the cement carbonation sink is not included), and ELUC was 1.2±0.7 Gt C yr−1, for a total anthropogenic CO2 emission (including the cement carbonation sink) of 11.1±0.8 Gt C yr−1 (40.7±3.2 Gt CO2 yr−1). Also, for 2022, GATM was 4.6±0.2 Gt C yr−1 (2.18±0.1 ppm yr−1; ppm denotes parts per million), SOCEAN was 2.8±0.4 Gt C yr−1, and SLAND was 3.8±0.8 Gt C yr−1, with a BIM of −0.1 Gt C yr−1 (i.e. total estimated sources marginally too low or sinks marginally too high). The global atmospheric CO2 concentration averaged over 2022 reached 417.1±0.1 ppm. Preliminary data for 2023 suggest an increase in EFOS relative to 2022 of +1.1 \% (0.0 \% to 2.1 \%) globally and atmospheric CO2 concentration reaching 419.3 ppm, 51 \% above the pre-industrial level (around 278 ppm in 1750). Overall, the mean of and trend in the components of the global carbon budget are consistently estimated over the period 1959–2022, with a near-zero overall budget imbalance, although discrepancies of up to around 1 Gt C yr−1 persist for the representation of annual to semi-decadal variability in CO2 fluxes. Comparison of estimates from multiple approaches and observations shows the following: (1) a persistent large uncertainty in the estimate of land-use changes emissions, (2) a low agreement between the different methods on the magnitude of the land CO2 flux in the northern extra-tropics, and (3) a discrepancy between the different methods on the strength of the ocean sink over the last decade. This living-data update documents changes in methods and data sets applied to this most recent global carbon budget as well as evolving community understanding of the global carbon cycle. The data presented in this work are available at https://doi.org/10.18160/GCP-2023 (Friedlingstein et al., 2023). |
| Mots-clés | : | - |
| Commentaire | : | Publisher: Copernicus GmbH |
| Tags | : | - |
| Fichier attaché | : | - |
| Citation | : |
Friedlingstein P, O'Sullivan M, Jones M, Andrew R , Bakker D, Hauck J, Landschützer P, Le Quéré C, Luijkx I, Peters G , Peters W, Pongratz J, Schwingshackl C, Sitch S, Canadell J , Ciais P, Jackson R , Alin S, Anthoni P, Barbero L, Bates NR, Becker M, Bellouin N, Decharme B, Bopp L, Brasika I, Cadule P, Chamberlain M , Chandra N, Chau T, Chevallier F, Chini L, Cronin MF, Dou X, Enyo K, Evans W, Falk S, Feely RA, Feng L, Ford D , Gasser T, Ghattas J, Gkritzalis T, Grassi G, Gregor L, Gruber N, Gürses Ö, Harris I, Hefner M, Heinke J, Houghton R, Hurtt G, Iida Y, Ilyina T, Jacobson A , Jain AK, Jarníková T, Jersild A, Jiang F, Jin ZH, Joos F, Kato E, Keeling RF, Kennedy D, Klein Goldewijk K, Knauer J, Korsbakken J, Körtzinger A, Lan X, Lefèvre N, Li HB, Liu J, Liu Z, Maccatrozzo L, Marland G, Mayot N, McGuire PC, McKinley GA, Meyers G, Morgan E , Munro D , Nakaoka S-I, Niwa Y, O'Brien K, Olsen A, Omar A , Ono T, Paulsen ML, Pierrot D, Pocock K, Poulter B, Powis C, Rehder G, Resplandy L, Robertson E, Rödenbeck C, Rosan T , Schwinger J, Seferian R, Smallman T, Smith S, Sospedra-Alfonso R, Sun Q, Sutton A, Sweeney C, Takao S, Tans P , Tian H, Tilbrook B, Tsujino H, Tubiello F, Van der Werf G , Van Ooijen E, Wanninkhof R, Watanabe M, Wimart-Rousseau C, Yang D, Yang X, Yuan W, Yue X-L, Zaehle S, Zeng J, Zheng B (2023) Global Carbon Budget 2023. Earth Syst Sci Data 15 | doi: 10.5194/essd-15-5301-2023
|